i'm finally starting to learn my zoom g1x four
Ever buy something for your guitar playing stuff, use it for a little bit, then put it away and not use it for a year? How about 2 years? How about 3?
That's what happened with my ZOOM G1X Four.
Why? I really didn't feel like learning yet another guitar effects processor, especially when my now-old DigiTech RP360 gets the job done.
However... I bought the thing, I really like the smaller size of it since it can work on the floor or on my desk, I really like that it's powered by USB-C alone (no need for a bulky power adapter), and said okay, let's learn this thing.
After messing around with settings, I'm finally figuring out how to wrangle a good tone out of it that works with both my Yamaha Pacifica PAC112VM and Squier Affinity Stratocaster.
It was actually the Pacifica I wanted to sound right more than the Strat since I play that more these days, which leads me to my next point:
Some guitar effects processors are guitar-specific
The RP360 or even the older GSP1101 (which I also used to own) are amazingly good at making Fender and Squier guitars sound like a million bucks. DigiTech circuitry really works well with a single-coil and can make a Fender design guitar sing - but not so much for humbucker pickups, at least in my experience.
ZOOM G1X Four, once I dove into it, can accommodate both humbuckers and single-coil guitar tones, but it seems to "favor" humbuckers more. This is fine, since the Pacifica is an HSS.
It did take me a while to figure out the G1X Four. I've still not learned it 100%, as it doesn't exactly have the most intuitive interface. Usable, yes, but absolutely not 1-2-3 easy.
But then again, when choosing a do-everything multi-effects processor, choices are limited. It's pretty much either the ZOOM or the BOSS GT-1. The BOSS is nice, but... it's 15 inches long. Good for floor and not for desk. The G1X Four is 8.5". And I suppose the Line 6 POD Go also counts. But again, for-floor only because it's 14" long.
Only the Mooer GE100 comes close to the G1X Four's size at 9" long, but I'm not a fan of the footswitches it uses. I prefer the larger/wider style.
For those of you who would say, "just send your guitar sound to your computer and use software", no, not doing that. I want a dedicated effects processor with its own 1/4" inputs, footswitches and expression pedal, and have that with the G1X Four.
Yeah, it took me 3 years to get around to using this ZOOM, and now I'm finally getting into it. Hopefully this will result in making some new tunes soon.
i don't like hamburgers
If you would have told me years ago that there would come a point in my life where I didn't like hamburgers anymore, I'd have called you insane.
Well, here we are.
The hamburger is, as far as I'm aware, an American invention. When I was little, I ate many hamburgers, mostly from fast food places. During summer, dad would fry up or grill hamburgers. I enjoyed them both.
It's probably true that for many years, not a month went by where I didn't eat at least 5 hamburgers at bare minimum. And I might be completely wrong there, because maybe it was a minimum 10? I don't remember. What I do remember is that I ate a lot of them, especially during the '90s when fast food was still truly cheap for the most part.
I'm over 50 now, and my diet is vastly different compared to what I used to eat. For the better, of course. Lots of greens, yogurt, water, no soda, and so on.
However, if I'm going out to eat and it's decided the meal is going to be some fast food slop, the last thing I would order is a hamburger. And it all has to do with thinking ahead. When I think about what a hamburger is, how it tastes and how it will feel after I eat the thing, I want absolutely nothing to do with it.
What do I get instead for fast food slop? Chicken. Specifically, chicken fingers because I don't want bread. All I want is the chicken, maybe a dipping sauce, maybe some fries, water or a zero-calorie drink, and nothing else. For fast slop, that's acceptable.
What's the problem with hamburgers?
That's an easy answer. Unseasoned, bland and digests terribly.
Let's skip the digestion part and just concentrate on the meat itself.
A genuinely good burger has meat that's been seasoned before frying, even if it's a simple mix of salt, pepper and paprika.
Absolutely nobody does this.
Ultimately, what you're tasting with a burger is the bread, sauces if present, cheese if present, and whatever is on top of the burger.
What does the burger alone taste like? Nothing. A slightly moist, chewy, tasteless nothing.
Chicken places, on the other hand, will either marinate and/or season the meat before frying. It is AUTOMATICALLY better for taste right out of the gate for that reason alone.
I rarely eat fast filth, but when I do, chicken is my go-to. I will always take chicken over a burger or even pizza.
I apply the same thinking when eating at a traditional restaurant. I look over the menu, and if everything sucks, I'll order whatever chicken offering they have and go with that as a safe option.
Since it's difficult for a restaurant to screw up chicken, that's why I consider it safe to go with.
red line casio g-shock dw6900rl is just cool
Casio has their hits and misses with G-SHOCK watches. Generally speaking, I like them, but many don't do much for me as to how they look.
This one, however, really nails it.
Take a look at a Casio G-SHOCK DW6900RL-1 "Original Colors". And I'm assuming RL means Red Line, because seriously, what else could it possibly mean?
I have never owned the classic DW6900, but this one might win me over and I may get this for myself.
Is there anything new and fancy about this DW6900? No. It's the same old school tough watch that Casio has kept in production for years, which is exactly the way I like it. Casio takes risks sometimes, but they also know when not to ruin a good thing.
The change of the G-SHOCK text at top from red to white and the addition of the red border line may be subtle, but wow does it work well. That thin red line breaks up all the surrounding black very nicely. This is what a proper tough sport watch is supposed to look like. Wear it while doing yard work or swimming or on the golf course or wherever.
So I just described a total hit of a G-SHOCK, so what would I consider a miss? The Casio G-SHOCK MRGB5000R. That's a luxury G-SHOCK with a case and bezel of titanium alloy (some material called Cobarion that's claimed to be 4x harder than pure titanium). It also has a gold plated circuit board retainer, black DLC coating, and a ridiculously comfortable "Dura Soft" strap with the mold containing some titanium in it to ensure superior longevity. Yes, Casio went all out with the titanium on this G-SHOCK.
The MRGB5000 also has atomic timekeeping and can be paired to a smartphone using Bluetooth, because of course it can.
But is that super ultra G-SHOCK as cool as the red line DW6900RL? I don't think so. True, the DW6900 doesn't have materials anywhere close to the luxury level of the MRGB5000R, but strictly speaking from a style aesthetic, I just like the DW6900RL better.
It's not that the MRGB5000R looks bad, because it doesn't. As far as luxury G-SHOCK watches go, that's top tier stuff. I consider it a miss because DW6900RL just pops better.
If you can afford the MRGB5000R, get the DW6900RL also. But don't be surprised if it's the DW6900RL you wear more often.
watching wrestling from over 40 years ago
I've been watching some really old wrestling shows from the early '80s recently. One featured the wrestler Jimmy "Superfly" Snuka from a broadcast in 1983. He was 40 at the time.
1983 is pre-HULKAMANIA that didn't truly begin until '84, but what's more interesting to me is why anybody even watched this stuff to begin with.
Early '80s television really sucked. There were only two things that weren't complete trash on TV during those years. Late night television shows and sports broadcasts. That was it.
In '83, you were watching local evening news, The Tonight Show (and possibly Late Night), sports broadcasts for baseball, basketball or football, and if you had cable, wrestling.
Cable TV programming in the early '80s was even worse than what was happening on over-the-air television. The cable guys didn't have any nationwide shows that the big guys at NBC, CBS, and ABC had. They also weren't permitted to run baseball, basketball or football games either.
What they did have however was wrestling. Not a real sport, per se, but hey, good enough. So they ran it.
Wrestling shows and cable television was a perfect match. These shows were cheap to produce, cheap to broadcast, filled time and viewers back then were very willing to watch them.
It is interesting how these wrestling shows came up with storylines in this era. Yes, they did have storylines sometimes. When they did happen, it was only the absolute bare minimum required to explain why one good guy was facing the other bad guy. Maybe some dude would come on camera, shout in the microphone and say, "I heard what you said! You disrespected my family! And NOBODY does that in MY TOWN!", or something to that effect. Then another dude came on camera later and would shout in the microphone with, "Yeah! I never liked your family and I'm gonna run you outta town!" That was pretty much all it took.
Anything deeper than that would involve multiple people in a weak story. If there were two good-guy brothers and a bad guy was beating up one of them in a match and then went to hit him with a chair, the other brother would run out and save him. Something along those lines.
Aside from that, wrestling shows of this time was literally the same types of matches every week. True, the VCR existed, but it was really expensive to buy that in '83, so almost nobody had one. This being true, wrestling on TV could totally get away with repeating the same thing over and over and nobody complained. And even if people could complain, whom would they complain to? Nobody, that's who.
Again, early 1980s television did suck, so wrestling was one of the few things that was actually entertaining. Even if a particular wrestling show was boring on a particular week, it didn't matter, because it was a "sport" to watch.
Watching the stuff from 40+ years ago still holds up and I couldn't even tell you exactly why. There just seems to be a vibe with it that's a lot more... honest?
a watch with nylon strap is better for summer
The watch I currently wear, a Casio W735HB (no longer in production but you can look for one if you like), has what I consider to be the best strap material, nylon. But not just any nylon, as it has the thicker, better stuff.
During summer, PUR (polyurethane resin) straps, leather straps and metal bracelets stick when you sweat, and flimsy nylon wears out too easily.
Better nylon is far and away the best thing for a summer watch, as it does NOT stick when you sweat and breathes well. And wow, is it a tall order to find a watch with nylon strap that isn't terrible. But I found a few.
I used to own this watch. The only reason I parted with it is because it's slightly too large for my 6.5"/16.5cm wrist. I would have kept it otherwise.
SGW100B-3V has big digits, good nightlight and is easy to read. While not a G-SHOCK in terms of toughness, it's darned close to it and can definitely take a knock. This model is several levels better than a W218H (which is also great, but nowhere near as good as the SGW100B model).
This is labeled as an "avion field watch" (hence the dial style), and it's an Eco-Drive model, which means it's solar. The strap on this one is 22mm wide, and that's nice. Wide is good where nylon is concerned. Overall, a good case design, highly legible, and 100m water resistant. The khaki strap basically goes with anything, which is also a plus.
This is a smaller case at 39.4mm and also a fully automatic mechanical watch, so no battery involved with this one.
I like the pilot style dial with the hours inside the circle and the minutes on the outside before the minute track. The fact this is a day-date is also nice.
I saved the best for last, because this watch is just straight up gorgeous. This Seiko is an automatic, has great lume, ultra-good legibility, and has that "land tortoise" shape that's supremely comfortable on wrist. Nice size too, as it's a 42mm.
My favorite part other than its appearance is that the hour hand is a huge arrow. That makes an already-legible watch even more legible.
Usually I'm not a fan of blue dials, but it pairs up oh-so nicely with the strap color, so it totally works.