This one takes the cake, no doubt about it. The AFA has a boycott pledge against Target stores.
Were Target stores cited for treating employees badly? Nope. How about inappropriate discrimination? Nope. Price gouging? Nope. Most annoying logo? Nope. Target doesn't do or have any of those things ('cept for the annoying logo part).
This boycott pledge exists because Target does not use the word "Christmas" in any of its advertising. Evidently, that's bad.
Not that I defend large corporate enterprise or anything like that, but I applaud Target for completely ignoring the AFA's request. Know why? What Target has done is take some of the commercialism away from Christmas - and THAT'S NOT A BAD THING. I would absolutely love it if no companies at all used the word "Christmas" in their advertising. Christmas is too commercialized as it is.
A big company decides not to use the word "Christmas" to sell its wares. GOOD. That's one down and about a million others to go. Keep Christmas as it should be: A celebration of Jesus' birthday - not a free-for-all advertising blitz. Anyone that says "Yes! Put "Christmas" in your advertising to sell your stuff!" needs to examine that mode of thought and consider what they're actually saying.
Target's message is not "We're banning Christmas", rather, it's "We're not selling Christmas".
-- edit --
Found more that aren't "selling Christmas". Good!
|***Guitar deals & steals? Where? Right here. Price drops, B-stock and tons more.|
The Internet is growing at an annualized rate of 18% and now has one billion users. A second billion users will follow in the next ten years, bringing a dramatic change in worldwide usability needs. -useit.com
Impressive. I happen to be one of those internet users that's been online for almost over ten years and remember when the 'net wasn't anywhere near that mark.
Tt's difficult to imagine one billion people. To put this in perspective, the State of Connecticut roughly has 3.5 million people living in it. A billion is just... a huge number. Colossal.
I miss the 'net days when it was "for geeks" as is stated in the article referenced above. I liked the whole "newness" of it back then and the fact that a lot of people didn't know about it. It was like a condensed worldwide community, only open to people who were willing to pay $29.95 a month for dial-up access (which I did) and college students. Anything over 56k speeds was a huge priviledge and very expensive.
Now fast internet is all but free. I think in the next ten years it will become free. In more than a few towns across the USA there is freely accessible wi-fi paid for by tax dollars (I know that's technically not "free", but you know what I mean). Heck, even some of the larger truck stops right now have free wi-fi. It's all just really amazing.
I wonder what the internet will be like in another ten years.
Will there be any more "sites" as we know it, or will dot-coms go by the wayside in favor of words separated by dots like industrial.light.and.magic?
Will cars all be outfitted with 'net connectivity? Many cars have optional GPS (which I predict will be a standard option on all cars by 2010) right now. How long will it take before 'net connectivity is put in there?
Here's something to bear in mind concerning the whole communications thing.
Ten years ago in 1995 if you told me:
* All new cell phones will have the option of browsing the internet.
* A Global Positioning System unit the size of a baseball, with no external antennas, will be able to navigate you anywhere in America running on 2 AA batteries, and will be freely available to purchase at your local electronics retailer.
* Long distance will cease to exist in the USA (think of Vonage and wireless phone providers)
* Internet will be freely available just by taking a laptop to a wi-fi spot allowing you to instantly get internet connectivity.
* Your bank will be 100% online enabled and you will probably never have to set foot inside there if you don't want to.
* Your credit card(s) will also have the same capability.
* Brand new computers will be available for under $300.
* Motherboards will be developed that will fit in the palm of your hand easily.
* A data card will be developed that is smaller than your fingernail and can hold almost 700 3.5" floppy disks worth of information - with no moving parts.
...I would have called you nuts. Yet, it all exists and more innovations continue to be developed.
I'm hoping all this new tech will bring the world closer together. It seems to be thus far.
My Christmas present this year is a Garmin StreetPilot c340 from Pop (thank you Pop), but this is not my first Garmin Mobile GPS. Since it was introduced I've been using the Garmin StreetPilot i3 which I'll be giving to my sister since I won't be using it any longer.
(Incidentally, Pop bought himself the Garmin StreetPilot 2720. Holy moly is that thing nice. If I get the chance to use that thing I'll be sure to write about it.)
So this begs the question(s): Why the c340? What's wrong with the i3? I'll answer that as best I can.
As I said a second ago, I've been using the i3 since it was introduced to the market.
Here are the things I liked about the i3:
Rock solid reliable
Always turns on and has never failed. Contrary to some message boards I've read that Garmin GPS' have a problem getting a signal - that is absolutely false. (If any of those message board guys read this, we're not talking about the 2610, okay?) I have never, ever had a problem getting a signal with the i3. As a matter of fact, the only time I've ever lost a signal is when I went through a tunnel that went through a mountain. So if anyone tells you that Garmin GPS' have a problem acquiring signal, take it from me, it doesn't. It does work.
Unfortunately from experience I can say that I've dropped the i3 on the ground a few times (taking it to/from different vehicles), but the fortunate part is that it has never broken. It can definitely take a beating.
I have also used the unit in both extreme heat and extreme cold. It's never complained - and the display always looks the same. The display never needs to "warm up", it's instant-on and stays that way which is good.
The i3's display is great. Even though it's small, it can be clearly read and the brightness and day/night options can all be changed to personal preference.
I really like the fact you can "bookmark" anything, even while driving. Just hold the center wheel button whereever you are and it will respond with a beep and save the waypoint - even if it's in navigation mode. Nice.
And here are the things I didn't like about the i3:
Plate mount sucks
The i3 comes bundled with a small black plate which you can stick to your dashboard and then using the suction mount to mount the unit. You also can opt to just mount the i3 on the glass instead of using the plate mount.
If you mount the i3 on any piece of glass (like a windshield), it will stay there.
If you mount the i3 on the plate mount it will fall off from time to time - and it's very annoying. The plate mount itself won't un-stick itself, but the i3 will periodically take a dive to the floor. It doesn't hurt it at all, but while driving in navigation mode it can just ruin your day or at least ruin your trip. I've found that the "secret" to getting the i3 to stay on that mount is to wet the suction mount on the i3 itself and wet the mount before mounting it (such as with a damp cloth or paper towel).
You cannot change the information on the bottom
In "regular" mode, there are two small fields at the bottom display. On the left is how fast you're going (in mph or kph) and on the right is what direction you're traveling in (North, South, East, West or variant like Northeast, etc.)
In "navigation" mode, the fields are different. On one side is your estimated time of arrival to your destination, the other is how many miles (or km's) until your next turn.
You can't modify any of these. What you see is what you get.
On the handheld Rino 130 by Garmin you have four fields and you can change all of them to read whatever you want them to. The i3? Can't change a thing. I don't like that.
What town am I in?
The i3 will tell you how to get anywhere, obviously. That's what it's for. But it would be really nice if it would tell you where you currently are. I'd love it if you could modify the top of the display to read "Now entering (whatever town you're entering)" when entering a town and then simply read "(town and state)" when in that town/state. That would be nice. It shows everything else like roads, streets and highways. Why not the town and state? How hard would this be to implement, seriously?
Even better: The top could alternate (while not in navigation mode) between what road you're traveling on (which it already does) and what town/state you're in every five seconds. That would kick major ass.
Before I go off on this one: There is nothing wrong with the scroll wheel on the i3. It's always worked as expected.
My biggest gripe about the wheel on the i3 is spelling anything using it. It just takes a really long time. I understand there is no other way to do it with a unit this size - but it's still time consuming.
Other than that it works fine.
Tiny bit too small
As I've said from the first time I wrote about the i3, it's just a little bit too small. If they added just twenty extra pixels on the display it would be perfect.
In day driving the display is fine. It's only at night when the small size bothers me. I have no real explanation for why this is other than I notice it and the extra size would help.
This leads me to my reason for wanting a c340: Size.
I can deal with the i3's fudgy plate mount, lack of modifying fields on the display and the annoying-but-necessary wheel - but a larger display is definitely in order; that's why I'm getting the c340.
The c340 also has touch-screen (no wheels save for volume control) so making input is much easier. There are also some additional features like coming preloaded with the entire USA, Canada and Puerto Rico maps - very nice.
Some notes on data storage in the i3:
In the i3 I had to upgrade the TransFlash card from the existing SanDisk 128MB to SanDisk 256MB because I needed to input a ton of areas into it. At one point I was travling from Maine to Indiana which is a large distance (over 1000 miles). The 128MB card would hold almost all the data I needed in there, but just fell short by a tiny bit. Seriously, it was close. A 256MB TransFlash card bought at Circuit City fixed that problem and it wasn't too expensive.
The i3 will take other data storage cards and I'm assuming it will take a 1GB card, BUT... bear in mind you are taxing its processor with the more data you input into it. When I plotted a trip from Maine to Indiana, the i3 "thought" about it for almost forty-five seconds - and that's a long time for the i3 (it will usually calculate a route in less than ten seconds).
When you load in a new TransFlash card to the i3 it does not lose it's Favorites so you don't have to program them in all over again - but you do have to load in the map data via DVD to the new card (obviously). My i3 very happily accepted the new card and the data transfer to it was easy; just plug in USB, pop in the DVD and off you go.
The c340 also has text-to-speech which is cool. While the i3 would say (in navigation mode) "In one mile turn left", the c340 says "In one mile turn left on Center Street". Nice. Not exactly necessary but nice nonetheless. I'm sure I'll get used to it rather quickly. (grin)
I'll be writing a review on it once I get it which will be real soon.
Yes, I think this pedal sucks...
A quick guide on how to set the time, date and a few other tips and tricks.
This is not that big of a deal once you know how to do it.
Norlin era Gibsons are some of the worst guitars Gibson ever made. Find out why.
Guitar string recommendation for Squier and Fender Stratocaster guitars
24.75" scale electric guitars and other models down to the 24.0" scale.
When it comes to ready-to-mod guitars, it doesn't get much better than this.
Oh, no... not another Norlin era Gibson.
It's real-deal Fender vintage, it's available, and there's one other rather nice advantage to owning one of these.
When you want a Bigsby vibrato on a genuinely well-built guitar for not a lot of money, you go Gretsch.
There is a whole lot of wow to this Les Paul.
Is this a classic, or is it tacky? Let's talk about that.