rich menga books search contact

***Secret FSR Fender guitars? Yes, they exist, and they're right here

Amazon links are affiliated. Learn more.

Can the Gibson Firebird X be saved?

Gibson Firebird X

Above is a Gibson Firebird X; a ridiculously expensive guitar that looks like a children's toy. Oh sure, it's got every single feature you'd ever want, including one that you don't: The fact that when the proprietary battery dies, it renders the instrument unplayable until you put in a freshly charged battery. I'm not kidding. But it's New! and Interesting! and Innovative! Yeah, well the guitar community said to Gibson that they can take their new, interesting, innovative nonsense and shove it up their ass.

I've actually seen an X in person. It was at Guitar Center in Tampa and I asked the sales guy if any of them sold. One sold. Just one. And bear in mind this was at the height of the X's popularity. And no, I didn't play it. I could have if I wanted to, but I just didn't see the point.

The Firebird X could be saved... if it wasn't a Firebird X

Imagine for a moment if the X was a regular electric guitar with a passive pickup set, finished with a dark wine red color (see example of that color on this Epiphone), had an ebony fingerboard with rectangle block inlays and was priced at $900 or so for a USA model, and $500 for an Asian-made Epiphone model. I guarantee you Gibson would have sold every one of them and there probably would have been demand for more. But unfortunately, nobody at Gibson is that smart.

I honestly believe the Firebird X shape isn't that bad, but the styling choices are what make the guitar look like a toy more than anything else.

The guitar both in photo and in person just looks cheap. The swirl-style finish makes the body look like it's made out of plastic. The maple board with dot inlays looks like something you'd find on a Jay Turser guitar that sells for well under $200. The knobs and toggle switches make the guitar look more like a video game controller than an instrument.

Now if you took all that crap out, simplified the electronics to just be one push/pull volume (for coil splitting), one push/pull tone (for further coil splitting or possibly a boost switch), and a 5-way selector, finished the guitar in a solid color and put on a dark fingerboard with proper upscale inlay work, then yes, the X would be a great guitar that players would actually want.

Will it ever happen?


Gibson does have enough talent to produce new and interesting guitars. But they keep missing the mark with bad color choices, useless features that nobody wants and a price point nobody can afford.

I do hope Gibson saves the design and reintroduces it as a simplified, mid-priced Epiphone model. The X design does have potential if it's done right the second time around, should that happen.

***Guitar deals & steals? Where? Right here. Price drops, B-stock and tons more.

Squier Jazzmaster gets upgrades with both new and 21-year-old parts

Squier Jazzmaster w/1993 Stratocaster knobs

My Squier Jazzmaster developed an electronics problem. The volume pot developed a nasty dead spot around a 3/4 turn, and the tone pot was getting a bit scratchy.

I'm not a guy who knows how to work on electronics when it comes to guitars. Or to be more accurate, I can work on them, but for anything outside of a normal setup or a simple soldering job, I'm not that good at it.

Stratocaster and Telecaster wiring is easy. Jazzmaster and Jaguar wiring on the other hand is a bit more complicated. Not insanely complicated, but I'm not familiar with it.

Fortunately, I know people that know how to work on guitars and now my Jazzmaster is all fixed up and slightly upgraded, so here's the story on that, along with a fair amount of guitar tech-talk.


Traditional Jazzmaster and Jaguar wiring uses potentiometers that are totally different from other Fender or Fender-style guitars.

The vast majority of Strats and Teles use 250K audio taper pots.

Jazzmaster and Jaguar electronics however use a 1meg linear taper for the volume pot and a 1meg audio taper pot for the tone control. I'm specifically talking about the lower lead circuit controls here and not the upper controls on the top horn.

In basic terms, what this means is that the volume pot has a fast cutoff while the tone pot has a more gradual cutoff.

Here's the bogey, however: While I was pretty sure the Squier Jazzmaster uses 1meg pots (the sound the guitar produces makes that fairly obvious), I had no idea whether it was using the traditional linear-volume/audio-tone pots or if they switched it up and did audio-volume/audio-tone.

I took a guess that it uses linear-volume/audio-tone. Fortunately, I was right because the resistance curve of the pots when in use still sounds the same as before.

Actually, that's not true. It sounds slightly different now, but for other reasons that I will mention right... now.

Things done, things fixed

Jazzmaster shielding

Under the pick guard, the wiring was redone to be more of the traditional Jazzmaster style.

In addition to the replacement pots, copper shielding was installed, and a good amount of re-soldering was done because of Squier's "glob o' solder" way of doing things.

I provided the tech an electrical diagram of a Jazzmaster. When the guitar was finished, he said Squier mostly followed the original specs, but there were a few things that were done by the factory as cost-cutter measures. All of those cost-cutter things were found and attended to appropriately. As of now, my Jazzmaster is more true to original mid-1960's electronics spec.

The only stuff changed out were the lead circuit pots and a few wires. No other mods present other than the shielding, which really doesn't count as a mod.

How does it sound now?

The signal path has definitely cleaned up quite a bit. And since it now has proper grade pots in it, the treble increased to the point where it "screeches" a bit on 10. However, that is what traditional Jazzmaster wiring is supposed to sound like; this is commonly known as an "ice pick" sound. I'm okay with this, because turning the volume down a little cures that easily, being the volume pot is linear.

Also, the front (neck) pickup has more output to it now. Because of that, it's now louder in a good way. The rhythm circuit also has a little more treble response to it.

The immediate improvement I have is with the volume pot. I can now make very small adjustments when I want to whereas I couldn't before. It's nice having a good, proper linear volume pot on my Jazz.

The '93 USA Strat makes its contribution

I bought some Gibson "witch hat" style knobs for my Jazz. However, they don't fit on the new potentiometer posts, nor do my old Squier knobs fit on them either.

The knobs you see in the photo at the top of this article are from my '93 USA Stratocaster. Yes, I have 21-year-old knobs on my Jazz now. I cleaned them up as best I could since they were a bit dingy, and they have natural staining from being as old as they are. But the dirt-yellow (colored that way from age) lettering on the knobs does fit the look of the guitar quite well.

Why wouldn't the old knobs fit?

Replacement pots use American-spec post thickness, so they're slightly wider than Asian-spec.

From a distance, it looks like nothing was done, but a lot was done

Ordinarily, when a guitar player hears "modded guitar", he thinks that some major thing was done to the instrument that physically alters its appearance. That's not the case with my Jazz. It looks like any other Squier Jazz, save for the fact that what's under the pick guard has been significantly cleaned up along with the installation of new lead circuit pots.

The mods done may not be anything major, but I have a guitar that works 100% again, so I guess this could be considered a repair + upgrade + minor mod.

No love for the Fender Mustang

Fender Classic Series Mustang

I do champion Fender design, but I don't like all their guitars. One guitar I simply can't stand is the Mustang.

► Read the full article

🔥 Popular Articles 🔥
Why I don't like PRS guitars
Why I don't like PRS guitars
There are certain guitar companies out there who have very little concerning a guitar I'd actually want to own, and PRS is one of them.
Casio F-91W
Casio F-91W cheat sheet
A quick guide on how to set the time, date and a few other tips and tricks.
Orient Tristar
EMF radiation danger in quartz watches - time to switch to automatic?
Did you know that quartz battery powered wristwatches emit radiation?
Garmin Drive 52
Older Garmin models worth getting (updated 2022 edition)
This is a list of the best older Garmin GPS models worth getting
Fender Player Sonic Red
The reason for the skunk stripe on Fender necks with rosewood boards
An oddity is that even though a separate piece of wood for the fingerboard exists, there is still what's known as a "skunk stripe" on the back of the neck.
Casio MTP-1370D
Casio MTP-1370D, the poor man's Rolex Day-Date
The Casio MTP-1370D is the cheapest way to get a Rolex Day-Date look
⭐ Recent Articles ⭐
Jackson JS11 Dinky
Jackson JS11 Dinky, the ultimate project guitar?
When it comes to ready-to-mod guitars, it doesn't get much better than this.
Gibson L6-S, a Norlin era beast from the 1970s
Oh, no... not another Norlin era Gibson.
1960 Fender Musicmaster
Fender Musicmaster might be the ultimate retirement guitar
It's real-deal Fender vintage, it's available, and there's one other rather nice advantage to owning one of these.
Gretsch G2655T Streamliner Brownstone Maple
The easiest Bigsby? Gretsch G2655T Streamliner
When you want a Bigsby vibrato on a genuinely well-built guitar for not a lot of money, you go Gretsch.
Epiphone Les Paul Standard 60s Bourbon Burst
Almost perfect, Epiphone Les Paul Standard '60s Bourbon Burst
There is a whole lot of wow to this Les Paul.
Squier 40th Anniversary Jazzmaster Gold Edition
Classic or tacky? Squier 40th Anniversary Jazzmaster Gold Edition
Is this a classic, or is it tacky? Let's talk about that.